The recent bill pushed by Trump, exceeding 900 pages, raises concerns about its potential AI generation. Evidence suggests its unusual frequency of emdashes—often associated with AI-generated text—was analyzed using Google Gemini 2.5 Pro. This AI tool indicated that the bill contains over 100 times the average number of emdashes found in typical Congressional bills, though its accuracy is not guaranteed. Key questions emerge:
1. How is Congress navigating this bill? Likely relying on AI tools, which might obscure content under pressure to pass it quickly.
2. If AI was involved in its creation, what was the intent? It may aim to expedite inclusion of Project 2025 components.
3. How ethical is governmental AI use? Concerns include privacy breaches, biases, and lack of transparency. A careful approach to AI is essential to prevent issues linked to improper implementation, emphasizing the need for expertise and accountability.
Source link
Share
Read more