Exploring the Reasons Lawyers Embrace ChatGPT

In recent weeks, lawyers have faced scrutiny for submitting filings containing inaccurate AI-generated research, largely due to Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT hallucinating nonexistent cases. Despite these incidents leading to fines, many attorneys continue using AI for legal research because of pressing time constraints and the allure of efficiency. Andrew Perlman, dean at Suffolk University Law School, notes that while some lawyers misuse these tools, many find AI beneficial for legal service delivery. A 2024 survey reported that 63% of lawyers had used AI to improve case law summaries and research. However, misuse has resulted in misleading filings, including cases where judges discovered fabricated legal citations. Attorneys are urged to critically evaluate AI outputs and maintain diligence irrespective of the tool’s involvement, as the American Bar Association emphasizes a duty of technological competence. While some express optimism about AI’s potential, others caution against fully relying on it for accuracy.

Source link