The author conducted a week-long experiment comparing several AI assistants—ChatGPT (GPT-4o), Claude 4 Sonnet, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Perplexity, and DeepSeek—by using each exclusively for 24 hours. The aim was to assess their productivity benefits without switching between them, which the author often does to refine outputs.
ChatGPT excelled in personal memory, creativity, and emotional support, proving effective for tasks like guiding to a new soccer location and summarizing group chats. Claude was noted for nuanced reasoning and articulating empathetic responses, though it struggled with immediate requests. Gemini’s speed and Google integration shone through, despite lacking creativity. Perplexity provided factual, source-backed answers but lacked personality. DeepSeek impressed with its technical reasoning and vision analysis but was less friendly.
Ultimately, ChatGPT emerged as the favored assistant, offering a balance of utility and personalization. The author plans to continue using all AI tools in a hybrid fashion to maximize their strengths.
Source link
