Union Claims Politico’s AI Tool Produces Inaccurate and Misleading Content

Politico’s new AI product has faced criticism from its unionized staff for producing inaccurate and fictional content, including a lobbying effort by a non-existent “basket-weaver guild.” Initially developed in collaboration with Capital AI, the tool was designed to generate detailed reports for high-paying subscribers using information from Politico’s reporters. However, staff raised concerns that its implementation violated contractual commitments to journalistic ethics and required human oversight. Instances of garbled reporting and entirely fabricated details have emerged, such as the AI incorrectly stating that Roe v. Wade had not been overturned, despite Politico’s prior coverage. The outlet’s editorial union filed a complaint highlighting these issues, emphasizing the need for adherence to ethical standards. Examples of AI-generated lobbying issues included fictional groups advocating for data privacy and the No Tax on Tips Act, raising alarms about the reliability of AI in news reporting.

Source link