US Judge Grants Approval for Company to Train AI with Copyrighted Literary Works

A U.S. federal judge has ruled in favor of Anthropic, determining that the company’s use of copyrighted books to train its AI model Claude was “fair use,” as it aimed to create something transformative rather than replicate the originals. This ruling comes amid ongoing debates about AI’s role in creativity, with regulators and policymakers discussing potential regulations. Although the judge acknowledged Anthropic’s creative intent, he ruled that the company’s storage of seven million pirated books in a central library violated copyright laws. The authors who sued, including Andrea Bartz, Charles Graeber, and Kirk Wallace Johnson, argued that the practices constituted “large-scale theft” and aimed to profit from their original works. While this decision is seen as a victory for AI developers, Anthropic still faces a trial in December regarding the alleged theft of these pirated works, as the judge reiterated that the company cannot utilize unauthorized copies for its library.

Source link