Judge Rules in Favor of Meta in Significant AI Copyright Case

This week, a federal judge ruled in favor of Meta in a significant AI copyright case, following a similar ruling for Anthropic. U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria determined Meta’s use of copyrighted books to train its Llama AI models constituted fair use, emphasizing that the authors involved failed to present a compelling case. The plaintiffs, including notable authors like Sarah Silverman and Ta-Nehisi Coates, claimed their works were used without permission from “shadow libraries.” Chhabria acknowledged Meta’s use was transformative, focusing on the LLM’s new functions like drafting emails instead of substituting the original texts. While Meta’s commercial motives were evident, the judge found insufficient evidence that this use harmed the market for the original works. He noted that plaintiffs failed to substantiate claims regarding potential market harm from competing outputs. This ruling may influence future AI copyright cases, although its implications remain limited.

Source link