Academic Leadership Perspectives on Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Administrative Development

This research evaluates academic leaders’ attitudes toward AI in administrative processes, focusing on the instrument’s validity and reliability, participant demographics, and perceptions of AI. Initially, face validity was established through expert review, enhancing questionnaire clarity and robustness. Internal consistency, demonstrated by a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.690, indicated strong correlations within AI dimensions. Reliability, assessed via Cronbach’s alpha (0.897), confirmed the instrument’s stability. The participant demographic revealed diversity, enhancing the research’s generalizability. Findings highlighted five key perceptions: trust in AI (average score 3.78), significant perceived benefits (4.18), and notable concerns related to ethical implications (3.66). Statistical analyses revealed a weak, non-significant correlation between trust and leadership readiness (R²=0.034), but a significant relationship with perceived benefits (R²=0.040) and ethical concerns (R²=0.116). Ultimately, concerns about ethics significantly predict readiness for AI adoption, emphasizing their importance over trust and perceived benefits in fostering AI integration within educational institutions.

Source link