The article titled “But AI has no I: A phenomenology of intelligence without self” discusses the inherent limitations of artificial intelligence concerning self-awareness and subjective experience. The author argues that AI, despite its advanced capabilities, lacks the quintessential human attribute of self-consciousness, which is fundamental to true intelligence. By exploring phenomenological perspectives, the article delineates the differences between human cognition and AI processing, emphasizing that without an “I,” AI cannot engage in self-reflection or possess genuine understanding. The discussion highlights philosophical implications, questioning whether intelligence can be fully realized without selfhood. Ultimately, the author contends that the absence of a self in AI undermines its ability to replicate the depth of human intelligence, posing challenges for its ethical applications and understanding in society. The piece invites readers to reconsider the definitions of intelligence and the nature of consciousness in light of advancements in AI technology.
Source link
Beyond the Self: Exploring AI’s Phenomenology of Intelligence
Why AI Remains Limited: The Unexplained Boundary
I can’t access specific URLs or external content directly, including YouTube videos or comments. However, if you provide me with a brief description or key points from the video, I can help you summarize that information within your requested word limit.
Source link
Former OpenAI CTO Secures $2 Billion Funding for New AI Venture
Thinking Machine, a startup founded by former OpenAI executive Mira Murati, has achieved a valuation of $10 billion following a historic $2 billion funding round, one of the largest in Silicon Valley’s history. Murati, who previously served as OpenAI’s technology chief, left the company in September 2023 and launched Thinking Machine in February. The startup aims to advance AI by prioritizing usability, open science, and practical applications. Murati had raised concerns about CEO Sam Altman’s leadership before his temporary removal in 2023, during which she briefly acted as interim CEO. She was instrumental in developing key OpenAI products like ChatGPT and DALL-E. The surge in interest around Thinking Machine reflects a broader trend, as former OpenAI executives, like Liam Fedus and Ilya Sutskever, are also establishing their own AI startups, indicating a shift in the industry towards more structured and practical applications of AI technology.
Source link
OpenAI Keeps Jony Ive Deal Under Wraps Amid Trademark Controversy
OpenAI recently formed a partnership with io, a company led by prominent designer Jony Ive, which sparked excitement in the tech world. However, this collaboration has come under scrutiny due to a trademark lawsuit filed by iyO, a startup from Google’s X division. iyO alleges that OpenAI, io, Sam Altman, and Jony Ive infringed on its trademark, particularly concerning its product, iyO ONE, an innovative ear-worn device that utilizes bone-conduction technology for voice-activated applications. Following the lawsuit, OpenAI removed references to the partnership from its website and social media. The collaboration aims to develop a voice-activated AI device without screens, but specifics remain scarce. The lawsuit has prompted OpenAI to explore legal options against iyO, as the company denies the trademark infringement allegations. The situation highlights the competitive and complex nature of the evolving tech landscape, especially regarding new AI-driven products.
Source link
OpenAI Withdraws Content Tied to Jony Ive Agreement Amid Trademark Lawsuit – The Information
OpenAI has taken down content linked to its partnership with Jony Ive after facing a trademark lawsuit. The lawsuit, filed by a designer, claims it infringes on their trademark rights related to the redesign of the ChatGPT app. The legal action suggests that the project involved substantial creative input from the designer, leading to concerns about their intellectual property. Following the legal challenge, OpenAI decided to retract all promotional material and mentions concerning the collaboration with Ive. This development highlights the ongoing complexities surrounding intellectual property rights in creative partnerships, as major firms navigate legal landscapes while trying to innovate. OpenAI’s prompt response signifies its awareness of potential legal ramifications and the necessity to protect its interests amid rising scrutiny over ownership and attribution in design collaborations.
Source link
Tracker for Hedge Fund Startups Leveraging AI
The content showcases the individual’s expertise in data science, highlighting their leadership role at Coatue and their venture, Cybersyn. It serves as a platform to track startups within the AI for Hedge Funds sector, demonstrating a focus on the intersection of artificial intelligence and finance. The page is an update from an earlier publication and is hosted on GitHub Pages. Additionally, it includes a link to the person’s GitHub profile, suggesting a commitment to transparency and collaboration in the tech community. Overall, it captures the individual’s professional background and their ongoing engagement in the evolving landscape of financial technology.
Source link
OpenAI Drops ‘io’ Branding Amid Trademark Lawsuit
OpenAI recently removed its announcement video and blog post regarding a partnership with designer Jony Ive, following a court order linked to a trademark lawsuit from Iyo, a hearing device startup. The $6.5 billion deal, aimed at developing AI hardware, is still proceeding. OpenAI stated that the content was taken down due to a trademark complaint concerning the name “io,” which they contest. A representative from Ive’s camp labeled the complaint as “utterly baseless” and indicated a commitment to fight it. Despite the legal disputes, both parties affirm that the partnership continues, involving the acquisition of Ive’s startup, IO Products, and a merger with OpenAI’s research team. Initially, OpenAI positioned the collaboration as a significant move towards creating consumer-oriented AI devices. However, questions remain about whether the final product will retain the “io” branding.
Source link
D.C. Considers Repealing Minimum Wage Law for Tipped Employees
On Wednesday, the Washington D.C. city council discussed the FY 2026 budget, focusing on proposals to repeal Initiative 82, which eliminated the tip credit for restaurant workers. Although the initiative was supported by nearly 75% of voters in November 2022, it has negatively impacted the restaurant industry and worker earnings. Since its implementation, mandatory base pay for tipped workers has gradually increased, yet employment in the sector has declined significantly—over 1,600 full-service jobs lost from May 2023 to December 2024. In contrast, neighboring Virginia and Maryland saw a much smaller decline. Earnings also fell, with workers losing an average of $1,800 annually, hitting the lowest income quartile the hardest, losing $3,400. Mayor Muriel Bowser has called for repealing the initiative to aid growth in the restaurant industry. The council’s deliberations reflect the substantial effects of this legislation on both employment and earnings within the district.
Source link
The $14 Billion Rival Ready to Challenge Google’s AI Dominance
Perplexity, a San Francisco-based AI startup valued at $14 billion after recent funding, is creating buzz in Silicon Valley. It positions itself as an “answer engine,” providing polished, human-like summaries of web content with footnotes, intended to offer a cleaner, ad-free search experience. Critics argue that it primarily reorganizes existing internet data and lacks proprietary technology, labeling it a mere interface on top of Google’s and OpenAI’s frameworks. Despite skepticism, tech giants like Meta and Apple are reportedly considering acquisition, drawn by its fast growth and potential threat to Google’s search dominance. However, concerns loom over its sourcing practices, with various media outlets accusing it of content plagiarism. Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas defends it as an aggregator and has initiated revenue-sharing for content creators in response to backlash. As search continues to drive significant revenue, control over the next search interface remains crucial for Big Tech.
Source link
Tell HN: In the AI Era, Insight Has Become the New Currency
I’m developing a concept called INK: Insight, Not Knowledge. In today’s AI-driven era, access to knowledge is ubiquitous and no longer a competitive advantage. However, insight—recognizing patterns that others overlook—remains valuable and differentiating. The future will favor those who utilize AI not merely as a shortcut but as a tool to enhance their understanding, creativity, and innovation. I am writing a book to explore this framework and am documenting the acronym here. I welcome honest feedback on a few points: Does “INK” effectively convey the concept? Is the distinction between “Insight” and “Knowledge” clear? What are your immediate thoughts? Please note that I’m not selling or promoting anything—I’m genuinely seeking constructive criticism. Thank you!
Source link