OpenAI is set to appeal a lawsuit from The New York Times, which demands that the company refrain from deleting any user chats. The suit arises from concerns over transparency and the preservation of user interactions, which the newspaper claims are essential for accountability and investigative purposes. OpenAI contends that retaining all user data could compromise privacy and security. This legal battle highlights the broader issues of data management, user privacy, and the responsibilities tech companies have regarding data retention. OpenAI aims to balance user privacy with transparency, while The New York Times seeks to ensure that critical information remains available for journalistic scrutiny. The outcome of this appeal could have significant implications for data handling practices in the tech industry, particularly regarding user-generated content and how companies respond to legal requests for data access.

Source link

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman recently suggested that had people encountered ChatGPT before its 2020 launch, many would have believed Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) had already arrived. Speaking at Snowflake’s event, he emphasized that the term AGI is open to varying definitions, but the focus should be on the rapid advancements in AI observed over the past five years. He expressed confidence that this progress would continue. Altman proposed that a system capable of autonomously discovering new science or dramatically accelerating scientific discovery would qualify as AGI. He also speculated on utilizing a hypothetical thousandfold increase in computing power for advancing AI research. Industry leaders, including Snowflake’s CEO Sridhar Ramaswamy, discussed potential applications of such compute power, particularly in biology. Concerns were raised regarding the sustainability of increased compute energy demands and its environmental impact, yet Altman humorously suggested that these issues would be resolved by future super-intelligent machines, contingent upon popular belief.

Source link

Luma Labs has introduced the Modify Video tool for its Dream Machine, allowing users to transform video footage using AI without the need for reshoots. This innovative feature enables everything from minor wardrobe changes to significant scene overhauls while maintaining the original motion and performances. Users can upload videos of up to 10 seconds and select from three presets: Adhere (subtle changes), Flex (adjusts style and lighting), and Reimagine (completely alters video content). Luma emphasizes its AI’s ability to retain the fidelity of actor movements, expressions, and lip sync, making the final product appear seamless. However, the tool has limitations, particularly with a maximum duration of 10 seconds per clip, requiring careful planning for longer projects. Despite these challenges, the Modify Video tool offers an exciting opportunity for amateur and independent video producers to creatively reimagine their work. Overall, it marks a significant advancement in user-friendly AI video editing.

Source link

By 2025, tech founders across the Southeast are increasingly relying on AI tools to streamline their workflows. A survey revealed various AI platforms being utilized by those in diverse industries, such as EdTech and HealthTech. Piper Latham of CLEO Education praises Multiply’s AI sales agent, Murphy, for its role in enhancing her sales skills, leading to successful product pilots. Andy Seavers from Case Status employs Attention.AI to analyze sales calls and Scout to facilitate internal queries through Slack. Noelle London at Illoominus highlights essential tools like Calendly for scheduling and Fireflies.ai for capturing meeting notes. Other founders, including Paolo Catilo and Jessica Hubley, acknowledge AI assistants like Siri and ChatGPT for brainstorming and coding tasks. Wesley Belden finds value in tools that remember insights and automate busy work, while Miho Kubagawa emphasizes how AI helps her refine ideas and create prototypes, reflecting a growing trend of integrating AI into daily business operations.

Source link

CISOs must conduct risk assessments for each generative AI application used by employees and establish clear policies and procedures. The warning against the “Ostrich algorithm” emphasizes the risks of ignoring or rewarding the unauthorized use of AI tools, whether in the office or remotely. The significant usage of generative AI can pose serious threats to an organization, particularly when employees utilize these applications on personal devices, out of the company’s control. Such practices can lead to the inadvertent leakage of sensitive data, as even simple queries may expose information, while generative AI learns from user interactions. It’s crucial for companies to acknowledge and address these risks proactively.

Source link

OpenAI has launched ChatGPT 4.1 for paid subscribers and 4.1 mini for free users. GPT-4.1 is designed for excellence in coding and instruction following, while 4.1 mini serves as a fast and efficient alternative for users who surpass their daily GPT-4o limits. The update, announced on X, is accessible directly in ChatGPT, with paid users able to select it from the ‘more models’ section. Though still untested, these new models promise improved performance. However, the naming system for these models has become convoluted, creating confusion for average users. OpenAI is urged to simplify its naming conventions to better communicate the functionality of each model, enabling a wider audience to understand and utilize their offerings. As ChatGPT’s popularity grows, clearer explanations will be vital in helping users navigate the evolving landscape of AI tools.

Source link

OpenAI plans to appeal a lawsuit filed by The New York Times, which demands that the company delete user chats. The lawsuit stems from concerns over data privacy and potential misuse of user-generated content in conjunction with OpenAI’s chatbot technology. The New York Times argues that retaining user conversations poses risks related to intellectual property and user confidentiality. In response, OpenAI is asserting that preserving these conversations is crucial for improving its AI models and enhancing user experience. The situation highlights ongoing debates about data management practices in the AI sector, as stakeholders grapple with balancing user privacy with the need for continuous development and refinement of AI technologies. OpenAI’s decision to appeal indicates its commitment to maintaining its data retention policies while addressing the legal and ethical concerns raised by media organizations. The outcome of this case may set significant precedents for data practices in the AI industry.

Source link