The “Noise Adaptive Algorithm,” conceptualized by Rijal Saepuloh, offers a novel framework to protect digital images and videos from unauthorized manipulation by AI generative models, including deepfakes. This method aims to safeguard visual data without compromising quality for human viewers. With the rise of generative AI technologies, the need for such protection is increasingly critical.

The algorithm uses an “Adaptive Spider Web” structure to embed a dynamic noise pattern that disrupts AI processes while remaining imperceptible to humans. Users can opt for an “AI-Friendly” or “Protected” image output, with the protection remaining invisible and effective even in screenshots. The project has been publicly disclosed on GitHub as of June 2025, aiming to encourage dialogue and research on responsible AI usage. Saepuloh welcomes collaboration and discussion from interested researchers and organizations to further develop these ideas.

Source link

The article explores the impact of using AI assistants, like ChatGPT, on cognitive processes during essay writing tasks. It discusses the concept of “cognitive debt,” which refers to the potential decline in critical thinking and writing skills when students overly rely on AI tools. While such technology can enhance productivity and ensure well-structured outputs, it may hinder the development of independent thought and creativity. The author emphasizes the importance of balancing AI use with traditional learning methods to foster genuine understanding and skills. The article raises questions about the long-term effects of AI assistance on academic integrity and cognitive abilities, suggesting that overreliance could lead to diminished learning outcomes. As students navigate the educational landscape, they must remain aware of how AI can complement their skills without replacing the cognitive processes essential for effective learning and personal growth.

Source link

Code review has transformed from a focus on correctness to a deeper analysis of intent and relevance, particularly in an AI-assisted environment. As AI tools like GitHub Copilot generate more code, human reviewers are now tasked with assessing the fit, impact, and business alignment of the code. This shift necessitates a move from checking syntax to understanding the overarching design and reasoning behind the code. Reviewers need to consider how AI-generated code may introduce risks, such as flawed logic and inconsistencies, while still ensuring it aligns with product strategies and architectural integrity. The traditional role of reviewers is evolving to become more strategic, emphasizing mentorship and collaboration rather than mere gatekeeping. Effective reviews now hinge on probing the rationale behind decisions, ensuring that code meets acceptance criteria and aligns with business priorities. By adapting to this approach, teams can leverage AI’s efficiency while enhancing the quality and relevance of their software products.

Source link

Amazon CEO Andy Jassy announced that the company anticipates artificial intelligence will lead to a reduction in its corporate workforce as efficiency gains are realized. He highlighted that AI is being integrated across Amazon, which employs over 1.5 million people globally. The company plans to invest $100 billion in AI services and data centers this year, an increase from $83 billion in the previous year. Jassy pointed out that AI agents will significantly transform work and living, stating that while many have yet to be developed, their emergence is imminent and will enhance innovation speed for customer engagement. He underscored that these developments evoke concerns among corporate workers, particularly as other companies, like Crowdstrike and Duolingo, have already begun reducing staff in favor of AI solutions. Similarly, BT announced plans to cut 40,000 jobs, suggesting that the full potential of AI is yet to be realized in workforce reductions.

Source link

The paper, “Future of Work with AI Agents,” addresses the impact of AI agents on the U.S. labor market, focusing on job displacement and human agency concerns. To understand these challenges, the authors propose a novel auditing framework to evaluate which tasks workers prefer to be automated or augmented by AI, aligning these preferences with current AI capabilities. They develop the Human Agency Scale (HAS) to quantify levels of desired human involvement and create the WORKBank database, sourcing data from 1,500 workers and AI experts across 844 tasks in 104 occupations. The analysis categorizes tasks into four zones based on automation potential, revealing critical mismatches and opportunities for development. The findings suggest a shift in core human competencies from information-based to interpersonal skills, emphasizing the need for aligning AI advancements with worker preferences and preparing for evolving workplace dynamics.

Source link