OpenAI’s new research paper examines the persistent issue of hallucinations in large language models (LLMs) like GPT-5 and ChatGPT, defined as “plausible but false statements.” Despite advancements, hallucinations remain a significant challenge, as evidenced when a widely used chatbot provided incorrect answers about Ph.D. dissertation titles and birthdays. These inaccuracies can stem from a pretraining process that emphasizes word prediction over factual accuracy, leading models to approximate fluent language patterns rather than reality. The study suggests that current evaluation methods foster a guessing mentality, as models are scored solely on accuracy, encouraging them to provide answers even when uncertain. To combat this, the authors propose revisions to evaluation mechanisms—much like standardized tests with penalties for incorrect answers—to discourage blind guessing. By integrating uncertainty assessments into the scoring system, LLMs can be guided toward providing more accurate and carefully considered responses.
Source link
Share
Read more