Insights from Stanford and Harvard: Why Most ‘Agentic AI’ Systems Impress in Demos but Struggle in Real-World Applications

A recent AI paper by Stanford and Harvard critically examines the disconnect between the impressive demonstrations of ‘agentic AI’ systems and their performance in real-world applications. The researchers highlight that while these systems may showcase sophisticated capabilities in controlled settings, they often struggle to maintain efficacy in practical use due to a lack of adaptability and contextual understanding. This gap raises concerns about the reliability of agentic AI in various scenarios, emphasizing the need for robust testing beyond demonstrations. The findings urge developers and stakeholders to focus on enhancing the practical intelligence of these systems, rather than solely relying on polished presentations. The paper calls for a shift toward rigorous validation methods that assess how AI performs under diverse conditions, ensuring that advancements in technology translate into real-world reliability. Emphasizing the importance of empirical evidence, the research aims to cultivate a more grounded approach to the deployment of agentic AI in everyday applications.

Source link