Should we treat AI agents as employees? The clear answer is no. Unlike human employees, AI agents lack emotions, desires, and social needs. They don’t celebrate milestones or engage in casual activities like betting pools. While AI agents like ChatGPT enhance productivity—acting similarly to advanced tools rather than coworkers—they require supervision and correction. For instance, when tasked with finding competitor advertisements, the quality of AI output varies, necessitating user intervention to refine prompts for better results.
Ultimately, AI agents are more akin to dumb assistants that don’t improve autonomously. They demand ongoing employee oversight but don’t participate in a workplace culture. While they simplify tasks, setting up and fine-tuning an AI agent requires effort and understanding. Therefore, expectations should align with their technological nature, recognizing that while they support employees, they do not replace the need for human insight and engagement.
Source link
