Midjourney has officially responded to a lawsuit from Disney and Universal, claiming the studios lack authority to restrict AI training on their copyrighted materials. The studios allege intentional copyright infringement, asserting that users can generate images closely resembling their proprietary characters. Midjourney argues that AI training falls under “fair use,” stating that copyright law does not grant absolute control and must allow for public interests in idea dissemination. The defense highlights that many subscribers linked to Disney and Universal utilize their service, suggesting a contradiction in the studios’ stance, given that CEO Bob Iger has praised AI’s artistic value. Midjourney insists its users abide by the terms of service, which prohibit intellectual property infringement, and contends that creating similar images is not inherently infringing. Legal experts representing Midjourney argue for legitimate grounds for creating derivative works, including fan art and social commentary.
Source link
Share
Read more