The emergence of generative AI, like Google’s Veo3 and OpenAI’s Sora, is raising critical copyright concerns. When prompted to create videos of a time-travelling doctor in a blue phone booth, both tools produced outputs that closely resemble the iconic character from “Doctor Who.” Research by Vermillio indicates these AI-generated videos matched existing copyrighted works, with matches of 82% and 87%. This reliance on existing art raises significant questions about originality and copyright infringement, leading many creative professionals—authors, filmmakers, and musicians—to demand compensation for their work used in AI training. While platforms like Google argue compliance with copyright laws, many fear the implications of shifting legal frameworks that could enable AI companies to utilize copyrighted material without consent. As debates intensify, calls for increased transparency in AI model training are becoming crucial to protect artists and their rights in an increasingly AI-driven landscape.
Source link
Share
Read more