Home AI Hacker News Four Months and $800/Month with Cursor and Claude Code: Is It Worth...

Four Months and $800/Month with Cursor and Claude Code: Is It Worth the Investment?

0

Unlocking the Power of LLMs: Lessons from a Super-User

With the rising hype around Claude Code and AI agents, practical insights are essential. After months of hands-on experience with Cursor and Claude Code, I’ve distilled key takeaways for maximizing AI in coding.

Key Insights:

  • Quality Matters: Claude Code falls short compared to Cursor, leading to messy codebases. Productivity can plummet if not careful.
  • Understand Limitations: LLMs don’t “think.” They require precise inputs; garbage in means garbage out.
  • Context is King:
    • Provide 99% of relevant code in context.
    • Refactor code for better AI processing—modular and clean is the way.
  • Control the AI: Limit tasks to small, trackable pieces to avoid a chaotic output.

Think of LLMs as powerful tools that need strict boundaries for effective control.

Ready to dive deeper? Share your thoughts and experiences with AI in coding below!

Source link

NO COMMENTS

Exit mobile version