A recent research paper raises caution about agentic AI, which uses large language models (LLMs) to mimic human decision-making in real-time problem solving. Defined by IBM, agentic AI is touted as a transformative technology, but the paper titled “Hallucination Stations: On Some Basic Limitations of Transformer-Based Language Models” warns of its inherent limitations. It argues that LLMs may fail on complex computational tasks, leading to incorrect outputs. This is crucial since many applications, from software verification to financial transactions, demand accuracy. The authors, Varin and Vishal Sikka, emphasize that while the technology shows promise—like developments at Sandia National Labs—extreme care must be exercised during deployment, especially where stakes are high. Citing a Gartner forecast, over 40% of agentic AI projects may be canceled by 2027 due to escalating costs and risk concerns. Ongoing efforts aim to mitigate these limitations, focusing on composite systems and model constraints to enhance reliability.
Source link
