Home AI Hacker News How External AI Reasoning Conflicts with EU AI Act Articles 12 and...

How External AI Reasoning Conflicts with EU AI Act Articles 12 and 61

0

Unlocking Compliance Gaps: A New Framework for AI Governance

In an era where external AI reasoning increasingly shapes decisions, organizations must act now to adhere to the EU AI Act. This comprehensive article introduces a probability-based diagnostic framework that identifies compliance risks before enforcement action is enacted.

Key Points:

  • Evidentiary Gaps: The real compliance risk lies not in AI accuracy but in the inability to reconstruct influenced decisions.
  • Diagnostic Framework:
    • Measures five key drivers: Exposure Surface, Narrative Ambiguity, Synthesis Elasticity, Decision Adjacency, and Control Asymmetry.
    • Provides a Relative Incident Likelihood score to assess evidentiary readiness.
  • Regulatory Realities: Compliance is not just a future concern; it is a current governance gap that demands attention.

Are you prepared for the implications of external AI reasoning on your decisions? Don’t wait for enforcement to catch you off guard!

Request a confidential External AI Reasoning Exposure Briefing today: audit@aivostandard.org

Let’s ensure your organization can evidence what’s relied upon! Share this to inform your network!

Source link

NO COMMENTS

Exit mobile version