The author reflects on a travel experience facilitated by an AI assistant called Operator. Initially, Operator successfully booked train tickets and a hotel, specifically choosing Martin’s Brugge for its excellent location. However, when it came to creating an itinerary, Operator provided a generic one-day plan that lacked depth. Upon arriving in Brussels, the author found Operator slow in determining train details, leading them to rely on station displays. In Bruges, despite its charm, the author opted to enhance their travel plans by using more effective AI tools like ChatGPT, garnering detailed activity suggestions. They also explored other AI models like Google’s Gemini and Anthropic’s Claude, which offered similar, basic tourist routes. Noting the generic nature of AI suggestions, the author briefly tried MindTrip, which provides personalized itineraries and collaborative features. This experience highlights the varying effectiveness of travel-specific AI in creating engaging travel plans.
Source link
