The author reflects on their experience with stackoverflow.ai in a chess rematch, noting its slight improvement but ultimate failure by moving the king into check. They compare stackoverflow.ai with other AI tools like ChatGPT and Claude, pointing out its lack of unique features such as attachment uploads, internet searching, and chat history. The author argues that stackoverflow.ai primarily serves a niche audience of dedicated StackOverflow users, who may be disinterested in mainstream AI platforms. There’s frustration over the tool’s filtering mechanism, which allows irrelevant questions while blocking legitimate coding inquiries. The author concludes that stackoverflow.ai feels like a downgrade compared to other AI services, lacking innovative features and instead prompting the idea that StackOverflow should focus on enhancing human interactions rather than pursuing AI chat solutions that don’t meet user needs. Ultimately, there’s skepticism about the platform’s viability as a competitive solution in the AI landscape.
Source link
