OpenAI faced a legal setback in its copyright battle as a federal judge ruled that authors can pursue claims alleging the company unlawfully downloaded their books. U.S. District Judge Sidney H. Stein rejected OpenAI’s motion to strike a new “download claim,” affirming that previous complaints adequately alerted the company to infringement based on downloading and reproducing copyrighted works. The court partially ruled in favor of OpenAI by limiting the case to certain models, excluding newer versions. This case is part of a broader multidistrict litigation consolidating various copyright lawsuits against OpenAI and Microsoft, led by authors like David Baldacci and Michael Chabon. Legal expert Navodaya Singh Rajpurohit highlighted that authors must provide concrete evidence their works were included in OpenAI’s training data. The legal landscape is evolving, as similar copyright issues arise across the industry, with cases involving major entities like The New York Times, emphasizing the ongoing disputes over copyright and AI training practices.
Source link
