On October 26, 2025, computer scientist Santiago sparked a pivotal debate in the developer community regarding the deployment of AI agents compared to traditional programming methods. His post attracted 86 responses, emphasizing concerns about over-reliance on AI for tasks that simpler code could handle more efficiently. Many contributors highlighted the advantages of traditional programming, such as speed, cost-effectiveness, and predictability. Developer Vikrant noted that structured input favors conventional coding over AI, while others emphasized the critical role of determinism in production systems. As enterprises invest heavily in agentic AI—$1.1 billion in 2024—skepticism persists about its practical applications. Marketing tech like Adobe’s AI agents illustrate this shift, but respondents argued that AI suits specific, complex use cases better than broad deployment. Ultimately, this dialogue reveals significant tensions between market-driven AI adoption and practical engineering needs, urging organizations to evaluate technology choices based on task suitability and reliability.
Source link
