The Marshall Project’s Closing Argument newsletter explores the growing integration of AI in U.S. corrections amidst staffing shortages. In California, Delinia Lewis, associate warden of the California Institution for Women, envisions AI-driven robots handling essential tasks like medicine distribution and security checks, allowing staff to focus on complex duties. However, California’s budget crisis poses challenges for acquiring cutting-edge technology. Meanwhile, prison telecommunications companies are adopting AI call monitoring tools, raising concerns over privacy violations and breaches of attorney-client privilege. Companies like Securus and LeoTech face lawsuits for recording privileged calls, yet many agencies continue using such technology. While AI’s potential in corrections is acknowledged, experts emphasize the risks of bias and inaccuracies in predictive policing tools. As the U.K. advances with AI in its justice system, the U.S. must navigate ethical concerns to ensure the responsible use of AI technologies in prisons and jails.
Source link
